The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable mall, no references and can't find any
JayJayTalk to me 04:11, 26 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Delete Calling this a mall is a stretch; it's more a small swath of businesses in an office complex — and even then it seems to be just banks, offices and service tenants. I can't find any sources. Ten Pound Hammer • (
What did I screw up now?) 05:35, 26 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Delete - No coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. --
Joaquin008(
talk) 15:53, 26 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Delete Small, nonnotable mall, only of local interest. And per 10 LbHammer. Wikipedia is not a directory of everything that exists in the world.
Edison (
talk) 04:06, 27 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Delete. I had tagged this 106,000 square foot mall for notability because I questioned whether it met our notability standards. It does have run-of-the-mill coverage, but nothing sufficient to lead to a notability determination for a mall of this size. I agree with the above !votes that it does not.--
Epeefleche (
talk) 06:48, 27 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Most of the content fails
wp:v, and as it has been challenged requires inline refs. If there were a consensus to move, though, that could be done -- though as I understand it the obligation then would fall on the person suggesting the move to move all relevant article history, etc.--
Epeefleche (
talk) 22:12, 27 February 2012 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.