From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 04:39, 12 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Tesla pipeline

Tesla pipeline (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is too confusing - cite 2 does not mention "Tesla" - it says Turkish Stream Chidgk1 ( talk) 13:34, 22 October 2022 (UTC) reply

I just looked around and I suspect the IP editor who added cite 2 was confused with Balkan Stream or perhaps the name of the pipeline was changed before it was built Chidgk1 ( talk) 13:59, 22 October 2022 (UTC) reply

References

  1. ^ "EU approves construction of link roads for Turkish Stream". Daily Sabah. 20 November 2015. Retrieved 23 October 2022.
  2. ^ Gurbanov, Ilgar (2017). "Perspective for Turkish Stream Project: Possible Scenarios and Challenges" (PDF). Natural Gas World: 87–88.
  3. ^ B. Lana Guggenheim (18 January 2019). "Greece in Negotiations to Extend TurkStream To Europe, Through "Europe Stream"". South EU Summit. Retrieved 23 October 2022.

SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 01:48, 23 October 2022 (UTC) reply

This article will just confuse readers (I am sure as it confused me). Gas Interconnector Greece–Bulgaria and Balkan Stream are already operational. Nobody is going to build a pipeline called "Tesla pipeline". I don't blame you for being confused as the Balkans have been confusing people for at least a hundred years. Chidgk1 ( talk) 18:29, 23 October 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:57, 29 October 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Delete. A vague proposal from 2015 with very uncertain future. Fails WP:CRYSTAL Individual scheduled or expected future events should be included only if the event is notable and almost certain to take place. (Actually, we can safely predict it's not going to be built.) No such user ( talk) 09:42, 3 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:42, 5 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Delete - Does not seem notable. Onegreatjoke ( talk) 20:47, 5 November 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.