The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep Yahoo News , Californiaherald , londondailypost , london-post Uk all are reliable source of Information. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Litbeby (
talk •
contribs) 14:39, 5 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Wrong, not a single one of those is a reliable source and in fact, most should be blacklisted. The yahoo piece is just a press release.
Praxidicae (
talk) 15:27, 5 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. Those references are all highly suspect: for example, the "real" Daily Post hasn't existed for nearly 250 years.
~dom Kaos~ (
talk) 16:19, 5 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete an overly promotional article on a non-notable writer.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 16:30, 6 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep Notable writer, found coverage on web. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Twerk000 (
talk •
contribs) 11:14, 8 April 2020 (UTC)reply
You wanna provide those sources or just keep throwing out nonsense !votes?
Praxidicae (
talk) 12:23, 8 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete All references are either press releases or from pay-for-coverage sites. Best,
GPL93 (
talk) 15:42, 9 April 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.