The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. henrik•
talk 19:25, 21 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Keep - enough reliable sourcing, did a search and find that this case has achieved plenty of media attention. does not fail WP:CRIME,.--
BabbaQ (
talk) 15:49, 30 January 2012 (UTC)reply
Delete. I am not privy to BabbaQ's unspecified sources, but I couldn't find any. Specifically, what we need are sources that establishes that this does not fall foul of BLP1E, and I don't see how it is anything more than just another criminal. No evidence that anything changed as a result of the crime or the court case, etc.
Drmies (
talk) 03:30, 5 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Martijn Hoekstra (
talk) 09:53, 6 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
WifioneMessage 18:07, 13 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Delete or rename. If there is enough coverage of the incident itself then rename the article, otherwise delete per BLP1e.--
Ron Ritzman (
talk) 01:44, 20 February 2012 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.