The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable children's toy and fictional character. Article does not establish notability. Of the seven references present on the article at the moment:
Ref 1 is a YouTube video on a fan channel, probably a copyright violation, and is a primary source (it's a release trailer)
Refs 2 and 3 are primarily about other characters
Ref 4 is a picture of Barbie merchandise (primary source) hosted on Flickr
Refs 5, 6 and 7 are primary (barbie.com)
In my opinion, the article's prose makes no attempt to establish the notability of this character, and the references provided do not establish notability either.
AdamBlackt •
c 23:55, 21 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment - The sources included in the article are all pretty much not valid for establishing notability, being primary or unreliable sources. But, searches are actually bringing up some commentary on the character, particularly on the depictions of her ethnicity. While a lot of it is fairly brief,
this book has a whole page on the topic, and is the best I've found. If not kept, it should at least be redirected to
List of Barbie's friends and family#Female best friends, and have some sources actually added there.
Rorshacma (
talk) 00:49, 22 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep - The sources found after my initial comment in addition to the one I already mentioned above seem to push Teresa into passing the
WP:GNG. The article should be updated to replace the primary sourced "plot" content with the sourced analysis, but it does not appear that Deletion would be appropriate here.
Rorshacma (
talk) 01:33, 23 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above doi links are all accessible via the
WP:Library access. All that said, enough sources
WP:NEXIST to establish her notability. The article can obviously be improved to incorporate some of this, but it does not need deletion. -
2pou (
talk) 22:36, 22 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep: I am convinced by the sources found by Rorshacma (at least a page of The Marketing of Toys) and 2pou (several pages in Barbie Culture). Barbie is important; people write about it.
Toughpigs (
talk) 23:00, 22 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.