From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Impact of the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic on science and technology#Telecommunications. Sandstein 11:50, 9 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Teleconferencing in the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic

Teleconferencing in the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG and could easily be mentioned in a sentence as a collateral effect of COVID-19 in one of the numerous pages regarding the pandemic PenulisHantu ( talk) 00:40, 1 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. PenulisHantu ( talk) 00:40, 1 April 2020 (UTC) reply
  • PenulisHantu, In which of the "numerous pages regarding the pandemic" could it be mentioned, while remaining within the scope of the specific article? · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 09:27, 2 April 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Keep - I usually lean more on WP:DELAY than WP:RAPID, and have !voted delete on a few of these coronavirus/culture intersection articles, but there are an awful lot of sources about the radical and urgent changes in education, many fields of employment, communication among friends/family, etc. that all revolves around teleconferencing. Some of that can be included in other articles, but I think this is a reasonable topic for a stand-alone page -- and potentially an article that others could merge to. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 00:54, 1 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. - KAP03 ( Talk • Contributions • Email) 06:01, 1 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. - KAP03 ( Talk • Contributions • Email) 06:01, 1 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. - KAP03 ( Talk • Contributions • Email) 06:02, 1 April 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete We have several separate kind of long articles regarding the impact of COVID-19 on different fields and this article has been written as a stub which is irrelevant. The effect on teleconferencing can be mentioned in sentences rather than creating a separate article on this issue. Abishe ( talk) 12:36, 1 April 2020 (UTC) reply
    Abishe, which articles are you referring to? One of them may be a good target for a merge. · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 09:22, 2 April 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete This isn't worthy of it's own article. There's no reason it can't just be mentioned in a general impact of Covid-19 article instead or something. It's to soon anyway. The craps effects just started. -- Adamant1 ( talk) 15:20, 1 April 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Keep if is expanded with sourced information which is too large to be in an existing article, Merge with an existing article otherwise. -- a3nm ( talk) 16:32, 1 April 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Move to draft space. On 17:28, 29 March 2020, Pharos added to Zoom Video Communications#Use during the COVID-19 pandemic the helpful (?) link "{{main|Coronavirus impact on teleconferencing}}". At that time, this article we're discussing here consisted of one, unsourced sentence. I find that edit by Pharos to Zoom Video Communications incomprehensible. Even now, this article is feeble. But it might go somewhere. When its authors believe that the draft is better (for its subject area) than are articles that already exist, they can ask for a move to article space. -- Hoary ( talk) 06:34, 2 April 2020 (UTC) reply
  • @ Hoary: The reason I did this is precisely because much of the content in that section of Zoom Video Communications is not actually specific to Zoom, but applies to the whole teleconferencing industry during this time. That page should only have Zoom-specific info, and currently it has generic content on the whole industry simply because it is the most commonly-known brand name.-- Pharos ( talk) 18:35, 5 April 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.