The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Creator seems to have ignored my "work on this in draft, it's eligible for deletion" advice, and moved this back. Delete for failing
WP:GNG, being
WP:PROMO content, and also failing
WP:NSCHOOL.
Note: Editor lies in their restore edit, check the original draft, it's not a translation. Warned for
WP:PAID.
Upon searching for sources (With GT at the ready) I found nothing but trivial PR coverage, but request that other editors double-check this claim. —
moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 17:38, 13 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep and improve Yes, the article has issues. Yes, the sourcing is rubbish (for now; can be improved, as a quick Google search shows). Yes, the creator has a (declared) COI, and may not have behaved optimally. But putting all that aside, universities are, and I quote
WP:UNIGUIDE (only a guideline, not a policy, but still), "de facto notable and should be included". This isn't just some dodgy private diploma mill, either, it's a publicly-funded German research university. Notable, in other words, by some considerable margin. --
DoubleGrazing (
talk) 07:22, 14 November 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.