- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 08:12, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
Tasty (Buzzfeed)
- Tasty (Buzzfeed) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
per WP:WEBSITE. Barely any coverage other than its social medias which appears clear promotionalism. Mullone ( talk) 23:38, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - or rather Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over. This is a prime example of artificially giving the illusion of notability by the number of citations, which for the most part are useless for establishing notability. Cleaning it up would be more work than starting from scratch. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 19:56, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - as per above. the obvious merge target is BuzzFeed, which doesn't need any of this content. The disambiguated page-name isn't suitable for a redirect either. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 20:20, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. CThomas3 ( talk) 04:32, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CThomas3 ( talk) 04:32, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.