The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 11:42, 14 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete Promo piece about someone with no notability
Lyndaship (
talk) 10:10, 7 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete , clearly conceived for promotional purposes. Also has all the hallmarks of paid editing.
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (
talk) 12:57, 7 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete no claim of importance or significance, and the refs are promotion about a person who promotes things professionally, or random podcasts she has appeared on.
power~enwiki (
π,
ν) 01:57, 9 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete. Wikipedia is
WP:NOTLINKEDIN — we are not a place where people are entitled to start PR-toned articles about themselves just because they exist, but the references here are not
reliable sources for the purposes of demonstrating that she would clear a notability standard: they are all
primary sources and
blogs and podcasts and YouTube videos, not media coverage about her.
Bearcat (
talk) 17:59, 9 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete even the visual style of the page makes it clear it is functioning as self-promotion.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 04:15, 12 April 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.