From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Tally Solutions. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:22, 29 January 2021 (UTC) reply

TallyPrime

TallyPrime (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable organization that doesn’t satisfy WP:ORG as they lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. A before search links predominantly to press releases which we don’t consider reliable. Celestina007 ( talk) 19:02, 8 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 ( talk) 19:02, 8 January 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 ( talk) 19:02, 8 January 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 ( talk) 19:02, 8 January 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 ( talk) 19:02, 8 January 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Celestina007, TallyPrime is a product (business management software) by a company called Tally Solutions. Please don't confuse things. Vexations ( talk) 20:30, 8 January 2021 (UTC) reply
@ Vexations, an error on my part I apologize. Thanks for pointing that out, it however doesn’t invalidate my argument. Best, Celestina007 ( talk) 00:15, 9 January 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete It still doesn't change the fact that the subject article does not provide anything remotely close to significant coverage in independent and reliable sources which is the standard by which every SNG and the GNG requires editors to adhere when creating articles. Fails WP:N so therefore should not be included. This was my conclusion after conducting a WP:BEFORE as required. -- ARoseWolf ( Talk) 20:54, 8 January 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Merge/redirect to Tally Solutions, the creator of the software, per Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Alternatives to deletion. Cunard ( talk) 09:23, 11 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Keep – I found a few more notable references from a non primary sources. Seems to pass WP:GNG — Preceding unsigned comment added by Itsyousuf ( talkcontribs) 16:56, 13 January 2021 (UTC) reply

    • Itsyousuf, You added three sources: [1] is a press release, [2] is an interview with Tejas Goenka, the managing director of Tally Solutions and [3] is another press release. NONE of these are non-primary. Please see WP:PRIMARY. I am reluctant to support the deletion of an article about a very widely used application, but I have no qualms about deleting unambiguous promotion. Either we get some better sources, or this article ought to be deleted. Delete, for now. Vexations ( talk) 21:55, 14 January 2021 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vaticidalprophet ( talk) 20:22, 17 January 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Doesn’t really seem like enough if you ask me. Foxnpichu ( talk) 11:53, 22 January 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect to Tally Solutions, not a single reference in this article meets the criteria for establishing notability as per WP:NCORP. All are press releases, interviews, quotations, promotional, etc. Seriously, its business software that was launched less than 3 months ago, Wikipedia isn't a promo website. HighKing ++ 11:47, 27 January 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect to Tally Solutions - notability not established for stand-alone article - Epinoia ( talk) 16:36, 27 January 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.