From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep / my own nomination withdrawn. Thanks @ CT55555: on the research. Will move as soon as I close this. Star Mississippi 01:40, 27 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Talaqan Dam

Talaqan Dam (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

For discussion, as there may be a merger target, but I'm not sure what. SV Wiki has the best, unfortunately dead link, NASA sourcing that might have verified this dam's existence. The photo here of the lake doesn't even convey that it's formed by a dam, whose existence is currently unverifiable. Thoughts? Star Mississippi 14:47, 19 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Keep It needs to be improved and there is no cause for article to be deleted. Brayan ocaner ( talk) 20:40, 22 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:53, 26 March 2022 (UTC) reply

The NASA links at svwiki work for me, but I'm not sure what its supposed to prove regarding the dam itself. I would say keep, but maybe remove photo because it is not clear if it is actually the dam Rlink2 ( talk) 00:06, 27 March 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.