- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 00:17, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
TaiG
- TaiG ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of notability. The article has no references at all, there is nothing at all on Google News, and a Google general search found no reliable sources - just their own Web sites and a few blog posts. I tagged it for Notability more than two weeks ago asking for any good sources, but none have emerged. Gronk Oz ( talk) 21:53, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk ☻ 23:08, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - None of this suggests even minimally better satisfying software notability guidelines. SwisterTwister talk 08:58, 15 December 2015 (UTC
- Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric ( talk) 17:42, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.