The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Davewild (
talk) 07:38, 20 June 2015 (UTC)reply
All references are either dead or do not support that this person is
notable.
Pishcal —
♣ 05:45, 5 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete per failing to meet the notability guideline for academics outlined at
Wikipedia:Notability (academics). An academic must be of a certain level of prestige but also scholarly achievement to their given field to warrant inclusion on this website.
TF92 (
talk) 10:05, 5 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Davewild (
talk) 07:13, 13 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete - nothing suggests any
academic notability.--
Rpclod (
talk) 12:04, 13 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete. His failure to appear in a listing of the top 25% of publishing economists in Brazil
[1] is suggestive that he doesn't pass
WP:PROF, and we have no evidence to the contrary. —
David Eppstein (
talk) 06:44, 14 June 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.