The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Daniel (
talk) 04:37, 20 January 2021 (UTC)reply
The article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NBUILD, it does not have WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS WP:RS The article makes no claim for general notability WP:GNG or historic, social, economic, or architectural importance WP:NBUILD. Sources in the article do not meet SIGCOV from IS RS. WP:BEFORE revealed directory style listings and government documents, nothing that meets SIGCOV. //
Timothy :: talk 02:57, 11 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom — very much non-notable. (The article doesn't mention this, but WBMA-LD itself is not on this mast, only
WDBB and
WSES.)
Sammi Brie (she/her •
t •
c) 08:57, 11 January 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.