- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 06:11, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
TOPYX
- TOPYX ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
References are either to their listing on Inc's 5000 list, which isn't inherit notability, or to non-notable sources and/or press releases. A WP:BEFORE didn't show much better. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 03:53, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train Discuss 09:04, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. MT Train Discuss 09:04, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Article has been more puffery and marketing than substance. Doesn't appear to pass WP:CORP. Niteshift36 ( talk) 14:45, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. only trivial awards and placements on unimportant lists. Refes of notices of press releases. DGG ( talk ) 00:49, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.