- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:43, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
TNT Motorsports
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- TNT Motorsports ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails general notabilty guideline. I have been unable to find any substantive third-party reliable sources to establish notability. Sable232 ( talk) 01:12, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Motorsports-related deletion discussions.
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Sable232 ( talk) 01:12, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason; I could not find sources to establish notability. Two of them were television shows under the TNT Motorsports umbrella.
- Trucks and Tractor Power ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Tuff Trax ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Motor Madness ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Delete all – There's clearly a reason these articles are effectively unsourced, and that's that there is effectively no coverage.5225C ( talk • contributions) 03:35, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment – I'm striking my !vote, since there is clearly some coverage as shown below. However, the linked articles only suggest TNT Motorsports may pass the GNG, the other three do not. However, as has also been mentioned, there is no direct association between the four articles. Since I do not wish to start splitting my !votes (which invariably gets messy) I will abstain from this discussion. 5225C ( talk • contributions) 04:37, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Strong Delete- There are literally zero sources on the page. Fails WP:GNG. Spf121188 ( talk) 15:43, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Given
Sammi Brie's sources, I'll strke my !vote.
Spf121188 (
talk) 21:54, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- GNG only cares about whether sources exist, not whether or not they are in the article. - "Ghost of Dan Gurney" 16:59, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep everything - There is SIGCOV on TNT Motorsports in this source, on Motor Madness here, and possibly on Trucks and Tractor Power here (though I can't verify at this time as it's behind a paywall. There also is strong WP:POTENTIAL for non-digitized SIGCOV for everything given the timeline of these articles. Furthermore, the additional nominations pass WP:TVSHOW, and none of these are BLPs therefore GNG needs not be applied so strictly towards subjects which predate mass use of the internet. If absolutely need be, these can all possibly be merged together, but I am certainly not supporting this position in this !vote. - "Ghost of Dan Gurney" 16:59, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I see some SIGCOV: [1], [2]+ [3] [4] Motor Madness has nothing to do with this company given that it went defunct on the SRO/Pace buyout in 1990 (first clip). Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 21:13, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.