The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This article came up on the community channel as needing clean-up for grammar, which I have done, essentially trimming it down to a quarter of its initial volume for unsourced claims, embellishment and obvious puffery. With all those removed, it feels like the person lacks notability and significance in their field of work and is subject to deletion. Most likely was created back in 2017 for promotional purposes as the untrimmed version had a lot of references to names of DVDs, exhibitions and other self-serving mentions.
Delete per nom; zero evidence of any notability
Spiderone 08:28, 31 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete most references for him are passing mentions at best. Tayi ArajakateTalk 09:40, 31 August 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.