The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This appears to be a
neologism, probably of the author's own definition. No references and so no indication that the ideology is
notable.
Robert McClenon (
talk) 20:30, 26 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete utterly fails
WP:NEO, as in, my searches turn up nothing beyond a use of this word by a movie blogger describing a quite different phenomenon "the symbiotism between both characters" and a lone news outlet discussing "the insidious symbiotism between politics and corruption ..." But that's all. Nothing close to meeting WP:NEO.
E.M.Gregory (
talk) 22:16, 26 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete. Nothing new to add, really. Fails
WP:GNG,
WP:NEO. Did my own google search and came up empty. If supporting references do exist, someone should present them, or let this one go.
nerdgoonrant (
talk) 16:44, 1 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete. A completely unsourced
WP:NEOLOGISM with a smattering of half-decipherable content. Perhaps at some point there will be supporting and a coherent description of this topic, but not at present.
Snowlet's rap 00:36, 2 August 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.