The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Drmies (
talk) 02:21, 30 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Fails
WP:BIO; little depth of coverage in reliable sources. Most of the sources cited in the article either mention his name only, or don't even mention him. Fails
WP:ANYBIO; appears to have made no widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record. Fails
WP:MUSICBIO.
DBrown SPS (
talk) 08:35, 6 August 2016 (UTC)reply
@
DBrown SPS: Please explain what "appears to have made no widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record" mean. I've seen this stale message being used multiple times before and it looks like spam when being used to nominate an article for deletion.
Xboxmanwar (
talk) 17:57, 16 August 2016 (UTC)reply
If you click on
WP:ANYBIO (which preceded the statement you are confused about), you will see those exact words. If you have questions about the statement's meaning, you may wish to leave a message at
Wikipedia talk:Notability (people).
Magnolia677 (
talk) 19:06, 16 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete. Appears to have produced some notable records, and in a genre where the producer can make a major contribution to the music, but I found very little coverage of him, the best being these:
[1],
[2] which don't offer a lot. The article claims he was nominated for a Grammy, but the Grammy website has no results when searching for him. He may have worked on something that was nominated for a Grammy but that's a whole different kettle of fish. --
Michig (
talk) 11:40, 6 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete - Little coverage in reliable sources. Does not pass notability criteria.
Magnolia677 (
talk) 04:23, 10 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jujutacular (
talk) 18:00, 14 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanztalk 00:51, 22 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Speedy delete G1 - It only covers
patent nonsense, and does not apply to user sandboxes or other pages in the user namespace.
206.125.47.10 (
talk) 02:25, 23 August 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.