The result was keep. Other than the nomination itself, there were no explicit calls for deletion, but a couple of calls for it to be kept, both by established editors. It is to be recommended that suitable sourcing is found for the article PhantomSteve/ talk| contribs\ 00:39, 4 July 2012 (UTC) reply
Not really sure about this one. I can find lots of passing mentions but nothing really that constitutes both a reliable source and non-trivial coverage about the organisation itself. Discuss. Basalisk inspect damage⁄ berate 17:26, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply