The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete/snow close. This was previously deleted and there is nothing really new here to go against the prior AfD, so I'm closing this early and speedying it as a recreation, plus a possible recreation by a blocked user.
Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 04:28, 29 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Egregiously spammy (auto?)bio article, which fails (from what I can see) to net a single article in any bona fide
WP:Reliable source.
Shawn in Montreal (
talk) 16:07, 28 June 2015 (UTC)reply
I believe the article creator is also attempting to create a
WP:Walled garden of article such as
Universal records forum -- now also at Afd -- in an attempt to bolster his notability for mouth-painting and what have you.
Shawn in Montreal (
talk) 16:11, 28 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep - considering all the sources and he is not only a world record holder, an artist too. it should be keept. many articles has less information than this but is still exist in wiki, like this one
Sababbi Mangal .
S chattopadhyay — Preceding
undated comment added 16:36, 28 June 2015 (UTC)reply
CommentThis article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because this person is notable with remarkable achievements and it should be on the wikipedia for general public information about his inventions and publication that are more valuable for public and is useful too.
S chattopadhyay — Preceding
undated comment added 16:37, 28 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep - I created this article because he is well-known in Kolkata,
WP:BLP1E wont be applied for this, because he is not famous for one thing, he is an well known artist too from kolkata and he have records in many different categories.
S chattopadhyay (
talk)
undatedS chattopadhyay (
talk) — Preceding
undated comment added 16:50, 28 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment: Second "keep" opinion from one user struck above.
AllyD (
talk) 16:59, 28 June 2015 (UTC)reply
I'm going to do just that, since it was previously speedied and since this is likely the same user trying to evade a block. The claims here are essentially the same, so there's nothing really new here.
Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 04:16, 29 June 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.