The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Daniel (
talk) 00:17, 8 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Support: I wrote the articles. I have frequent contact with Harry (young not-for-profit administrator of this organisation), and he's due to be in some national press/magazines/media in the coming months. Maybe this article is too late, in fact. Not many people like Harry exist in the UK, he deserves a spotlight, don't you think? :) — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
HumveeHardhat (
talk •
contribs) 17:47, 31 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete - the content of the article seems excessive and in support of a local issue... So, it seems it will not pass
WP:NONPROFIT, which is :
Organizations are usually notable if they meet both of the following standards:
The scope of their activities is national or international in scale.
The organization has received significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the organization.
I am open to reconsider if any good argument is in support of keeping it.
Kolma8 (
talk) 20:56, 31 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Support: To respond to you, Kolma8, Sustainable Transport Holding's scope of activities is not just a local scale. Some of their projects reach places such as Lutterworth (very much outside Northamptonshire), and Milton Keynes, a large city. They are not just in Northamptonshire anymore, although their name suggests otherwise. The organisation has received coverage in regional news sources such as BBC Radio Northampton (covering the entire county), and 3 different news publications across the South East and the East/West Midlands.
HumveeHardhat (
talk) 21:50, 31 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete a local organization that fails WP:NONPROFIT. 5/11 sources currently given are primary, which help to point out that this is really just an article about a subject that has local rather than general interest.
Possibly (
talk) 03:24, 1 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations as per
WP:NCORP is for multiple sources (at least two) of
significant coverage with
in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing
"Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. None of the references in the article meet the criteria and having searched I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria. Topic fails GNG/
WP:NCORP.
HighKing++ 15:54, 1 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete - as Kolma8 and HighKing have already pointed out, this organisation does not satisfy inclusion criteria. Admittedly, the inclusion criteria for organisations are a bit tougher than most but it's for good reason
Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:58, 1 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete - per above; fails GNG
Nightfury 14:36, 3 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete - not enough sources for GNG. Widefox;
talk 18:30, 7 February 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.