The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
No references/sources, web search shows this is a flash game on a maths website, with absolutely no media sources or mention in any article ever.
Kadzi (
talk) 15:59, 26 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete for so many reasons, (including but not limited to, lack of sourcing, COI, images for text!) but clearly not notable. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski(
talk •
contribs) 16:02, 26 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete Clearly non-notable with no significant indepth coverage from reliable secondary coverage. --
ferret (
talk) 16:05, 26 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete Anemic page with no sources. Fails
WP:GNG.
KidAd (
💬💬) 21:25, 26 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete - There is simply nothing in the article to even start thinking about a defense. No context, no wikilinks, no information about the subject, no refs, no cats. I'm seen more meat on fossils. Ben · Salvidrim!✉ 06:57, 29 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.