The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Possibility of merge to a single article.
Black Kite 21:38, 16 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
JForget 23:05, 3 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
JForget 22:19, 9 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Keep The situation is somewhat analogous to criteria in
WP:NALBUMS in that they are releases by a notable group. Some have hit high positions in the appropriate charts, and so arguably merit inclusion here on that basis. A quick look tells me that none of these could not benefit from any improvement, but that is not a reason not to have articles on each. The alternative is to merge to
Girls Aloud videography, but that is already a subsection of the discography, and doesn't have the detail provided by these individual articles.
Rodhullandemu 00:17, 10 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Keep Commercial release by notable band = notability.
The JPStalk to me 21:32, 10 August 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.