The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -
Philippe 01:54, 22 April 2008 (UTC)reply
Non-notable local student government political party. No reliable secondary sources. Original research.
SevernSevern (
talk) 04:32, 16 April 2008 (UTC)reply
Strong Keep Notable political party at a major, historically important university. References are currently being added to improve the article. Also, Wikipedia is an online, not print, encyclopedia, so even if this was a non-notable article, it would not diminish more notable articles.
SteveSims (
talk) 20:49, 16 April 2008 (UTC)reply
Comment Yes,
Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia, but see the rest of the policy: "This policy is not a free pass for inclusion: articles must still abide by the appropriate content policies." So, if you can establish notability through secondary reliable sources, then it can stay. --
SevernSevern (
talk) 20:56, 16 April 2008 (UTC)reply
Merge or Delete per
User:Jamesontai. This topic definitely does not satisfy relevant guidelines and hardly deserves a mention, let alone its own article.—NoeticSage 22:33, 21 April 2008 (UTC)reply
Comment - I really don't see much that is worthy of being merged, beyond "Student Action is a political party in the ASUC." The rest is unusable. --
SevernSevern (
talk) 23:03, 21 April 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.