- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 22:22, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Structured Liberal Education (Stanford University)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Structured Liberal Education (Stanford University) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable academic program; lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources, failing WP:GNG. Article is mostly unsourced, and all sources provided are links to Stanford-related websites or student newspapers, which are not independent of subject. Findings in Google News are mere mentions in articles, not significant coverage needed to merit standalone article. -- Wikipedical ( talk) 22:21, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Lightburst ( talk) 22:35, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete failing WP:GNG. I searched Google, JSTOR, ProQuest and GALE but only found passing mentions or publications in student newspapers. Subject needs more significant coverage to show notability. Z1720 ( talk) 23:30, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: - there is no coverage of the achievements of this program, nor the outcomes of the students participating, the academic excellence, the national awards won: simple notability outcomes. Another case of WP:TOOSOON -- Whiteguru ( talk) 11:40, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:GNG. The three current primary sources in no way establishes any form of notability. With this level of sourcing, any organization's program can make its way to bear down Wikipedia. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 07:48, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete, No independent coverage for the program ‘s achievements, fails WP:GNG, Alex-h ( talk) 09:27, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.