The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 18:13, 23 February 2017 (UTC)reply
A dish created in one chip shop in Glasgow. Fails
WP:GNG. Specifically, questionable whether there is significant coverage. Brief mentions in sources for this one-off creation, but I did not find sources reporting this food as appearing elsewhere or even elsewhen.
Geoff | Who, me? 22:38, 30 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep - I found quite a bit of coverage of it in blogs and forums, but more significantly, it is mentioned in several books including
this,
this and others, spanning 2006 to 2013. So it exists and is talked about and therefore meets
WP:GNG.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 13:59, 1 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Comment: the first of those links returns a 404 error for me; the second is a passing mention on a single page of a 300-page book. Existence is not sufficient to meet
WP:GNG – that requires "significant coverage", which I'm not convinced is contained in You Are Awful...
Caeciliusinhorto (
talk) 22:00, 2 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 14:52, 7 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Kurykh (
talk) 04:05, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.