The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanztalk 03:05, 26 November 2008 (UTC)reply
No reliable sources; therefore, notability not established.
KurtRaschke (
talk) 22:11, 21 November 2008 (UTC)reply
Delete The only references given are primary references, which cite the entity in question, and a directory of Shoutcast stations, which I question as
WP:RS. Ultimately,
WP:NNCharles D. Ward (
talk) 22:29, 21 November 2008 (UTC)reply
Delete Notability not established, and it's unlikely to be. This fails
WP:WEB and
WP:MUSIC fairly strongly. Individual 'net radio stations aren't automatically notable.
Bfigura(
talk) 22:59, 21 November 2008 (UTC)reply
And yet a handful of other stations, such as SomaFM who is a direct analogue to StillStream, have established Wikipedia articles and cite no sources at all. Apparently their notability is above question. My problem here is not your requirements but your inconsistent application of them. I will withdraw the article myself, but at this point I consider Wikipedia's neutrality to be seriously lacking.
Darrell.burgan (
talk) 00:25, 22 November 2008 (UTC)reply
Well I'm not even allowed to delete it. Whatever, do what you want with it, but I am sincerely disappointed and disllusioned with Wikipedia as a result of this experience.
Darrell.burgan (
talk) 00:26, 22 November 2008 (UTC)reply
Delete Non-notable, no secondary sources.
SlubGlub (
talk) 06:07, 22 November 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.