The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
✗plicit 23:24, 14 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete. This is largely a
WP:PROMO for a couple companies and a book, through a
professional profile (
WP:NOTLINKEDIN). This would require a complete rewrite which doesn't even seem possible based on available sources, I don't see anything other than trivial mentions, nothing to begin constructing
WP:BASIC. —
siroχo 17:42, 7 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete. This nomination is on the merits or lack thereof and actually holds water.
gidonb (
talk) 18:08, 8 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep. I consider the subject of the article has notability as a creative professional in the marketing sector, the article can be expanded with the support of new sources. I'm compiling them, but would need a bit more time to improve the article. --
Dennis6492 (
talk) 05:34, 11 September 2023 (UTC)reply
'Delete' Looked at the first two blocks of references. They are trival
WP:PRIMARYWP:SPS sources of the worst kind. It reads like a linkedin profile. Fails
WP:SIGCOV. scope_creepTalk 10:44, 14 September 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.