From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 04:55, 3 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Steven Richter

Steven Richter (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to pass GNG Pipsally ( talk) 13:16, 26 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Pipsally ( talk) 13:16, 26 January 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:19, 26 January 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:20, 26 January 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete This article is written in an unclear way. – Cupper52 Discuss! 14:14, 26 January 2021 (UTC) reply
    I don't see anything unclear about the article, and, anyway, if it was written in an unclear way that would be a reason for editing, not deletion. Phil Bridger ( talk) 21:46, 26 January 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete there is nothing here even close to showing notability. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 18:25, 26 January 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Nominator's Comment The user RRfeatures - current adding a bunch of sources either self published or with passing mentions - appears to be another name for Reverie films, which is Richter's production company. Pipsally ( talk) 11:46, 27 January 2021 (UTC) reply
Well spotted. I've left a message for him/her. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:55, 27 January 2021 (UTC) reply
It's also worth nothing this appears to be a self-created article by the subject to begin with. The new sources being added have no substantive references to Richter's personal notability, being largely listings or non-notable reviews. Pipsally ( talk) 12:06, 27 January 2021 (UTC) reply
Source assessment table:
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
http://web-old.archive.org/web/20161227200530/http://primeiroplanocom.com.br/site/index.php/academia-internacional-de-cinema-inaugura-curso-de-som-para-cinema-e-tv-no-rio-de-janeiro/ Yes ? No Mention is fairly brief No
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1753573/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0 No IMDb is not reliable No No
https://lfs.org.uk/content/raindance-selects-center-gravity-and-when-song-dies Yes Yes No Just a name check No
https://oregonconfluence.com/2013/01/27/birds-of-neptune-a-film-by-steven-richter-is-currently-in-production-in-portland-or-to-be-released-in-fall-2013/ Yes No Blog Yes No
https://www.hammertonail.com/film-festivals/slamdance-2015-preview/ Yes Yes No No
https://screenanarchy.com/2015/01/slamdance-2015-review-birds-of-neptune-of-malady-and-mysticism.html Yes Yes No No
https://www.thewrap.com/slamdance-unveils-remaining-2015-lineup-exclusive/ Yes Yes No As with the two above, this is a passing mention No
https://eatdrinkfilms.com/2015/02/05/slamdancin-in-park-city-ficks-top-five-picks-and-a-batkid-bonus/ Yes No Blog No No
https://www.oregonlive.com/movies/2015/01/portland_independent_film_make.html Yes Yes No No
https://silverscreenriot.com/birds-of-neptune-review/ Yes No No No
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt4132010/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0 No No No
http://revista.algomais.com/cultura/academia-internacional-de-cinema-oferece-bolsas-para-formacao-em-audiovisual Yes Yes No Doesn't appear to be mentioned No
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JaMoEPRY-Ps&ab_channel=AcademiaInternacionaldeCinema%28AIC%29 No No No
https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/fsp/ilustrad/fq0502200718.htm Yes Yes No Not mentioned No
http://roteironews.blogspot.com/2010/05/robert-mckee-em-sao-paulo-e-no-chile-em.html ? No Blog No No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.