From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:TNT. Randykitty ( talk) 18:42, 29 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Steve Schwartz and Paula Mae Schwartz

Steve Schwartz and Paula Mae Schwartz (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article on three people (two in article title) that is essentially duplicative of Schwartz Communications. No assertion of notability independent of organization. Coretheapple ( talk) 17:41, 6 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:13, 7 December 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:13, 7 December 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:13, 7 December 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete I considered a redirect to Schwartz Communications, but I think not; this is an unlikely search term and the firm itself is (IMO) barely notable enough for an article. -- MelanieN ( talk) 00:25, 13 December 2014 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica 1000 18:23, 13 December 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Rename They have exited Schwartz Communications and have a new company, Chockstone Pictures, so a redirect to Schwartz Communications does not cover the content on this page. However, there is no page for Chockstone Pictures, and this page could reasonably be renamed to that, since that is the company responsible for the films listed here. There are pages for other production companies on WP. Then there is the issue of references: the ones here are not reliable sources. I found a few mentions in some movie-related sites, but they are a production company, and that's rather work-a-day in Hollywood and does not generally get separate attention. I did find this link: [1]. Their list of films is here: [2]. There are only 5-6 so far, none block-busters but two with Brad Pitt, so they undoubtedly have some clout in Hollywood. I'd rename this to Chockstone Pictures, add the one reference, include them in the list of production companies, and then see what develops. LaMona ( talk) 17:20, 21 December 2014 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dea db eef 18:16, 21 December 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete and burn. This article is a mess, going and coming. It's an article on a person — no, scratch that, two people — but according to the lead, it's about three people? And are people really going to enter the search term "Steve Schwartz and Paula Mae Schwartz" into Wikipedia, Google, or anywhere else? (Suddenly I'm wishing I could see if anyone EVER had searched for that term independent of clicking the link above). Possibly, possibly converting the article into one about Chockstone Pictures might be appropriate, but even then, there'd be significant work to be done to make it viable, and even to prove notability. Jsharpminor ( talk) 03:55, 29 December 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.