- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 01:07, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
Stephen Mendel
- Stephen Mendel ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable actor autobiography. I'm not seeing any in depth coverage in independent third party sources as required by the WP:GNG. Nothing better in google either. I'm not a TV fan nor a Canadian, so maybe there are specialist sources out there that I'm not seeing? Stuartyeates ( talk) 10:26, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Clear COI as the major contributor is the subject of the article so is AUTOBIO. Written like an advertisement. No notable press coverage. Cowlibob ( talk) 10:39, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nom & Cowlibob - Clearly coi bs that serves no purpose here!. – Davey2010 • (talk) 13:44, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:51, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:51, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:51, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete There's potential for a proper article, given his lengthy role on Night Heat, but I can't find any source that does more than say he appeared in it, and generally we don't give articles to everyone who appears in a hit show, no matter the role. After this is deleted it might make sense to redirect to Stephen Mandel, as a misspelling. -- Rob ( talk) 07:30, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.