The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Declining suggestion to
WP:SALT since as far as I can see this title has never been deleted previously.
RL0919 (
talk) 15:19, 22 October 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete. Non-notable individual. Promotional. Recently was edited to include links to seminars.
DiamondRemley39 (
talk) 14:13, 15 October 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete - This is a very
WP:PROMO article, but there does seem to be a bit of coverage of this man, albeit not rising to the level of
WP:SIGCOV in reliable sources.
His winning of the prize is a bare mention in a long list of names. Mentions in the newspapers are mostly him talking about something else, and thus not significant coverage of him, there was an interview published in
The Nation but this is a primary source/arguably not independent. Therefore fails
WP:BASIC.
FOARP (
talk) 19:39, 15 October 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete and
salt with ECP. The biography is hopelessly
promotional. The subject may be notable, but if so, only a neutral editor should write a
BLP.
Robert McClenon (
talk) 17:41, 17 October 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete , A promotional article and does not meet
WP:SIGCOV,
Alex-h (
talk) 16:43, 20 October 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.