- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. RL0919 ( talk) 01:52, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Stephanie Korey
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Stephanie Korey ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject of the page is not notable, while there is normally a presumption under WP:NOTABLE that Significant Coverage presumes the source should have an article, it is worth noting that a lot of the content in here relates to the company Away, rather than this person. Propose moving most content to a page on the company and deleting this BLP. Ethanmayersweet ( talk) 21:09, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Ethanmayersweet ( talk) 21:09, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Ethanmayersweet ( talk) 21:09, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Ethanmayersweet ( talk) 21:09, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete a non-notable businesswoman. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 21:39, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. Even before the recent kerfuffle, she was the founder of a widely-covered unicorn, received significant coverage in that role, and ended up on multiple notable-people lists. Now, as a poster child for the unicorn excesses and bad management, she's even more clearly notable. One of Wikipedia's most important functions is helping people learn about something or someone in the news, so at the very least any decision about notability should wait until we see how things settle after this current wave of press attention. William Pietri ( talk) 22:01, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:18, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:19, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
- Keep She co-founded a highly-valued start up and then became subject to intense media coverage due to the workplace culture. She has quite a bit of notable news coverage and will likely continue to remain a public figure in some capacity. Seems like an easy keep. Bwabwa7 ( talk) 15:48, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
- Strong Keep for reasons cited above. -- JumpLike23 (talk)
- Weak Keep Keep for posterity because of her current and previous positions at notable companies but the state of the article atm needs much expansion if she is as widely covered as people say she is. Right now it just reads like condensed PR. -- BriefEdits ( talk) 00:01, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.