The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep and clean up. The fact that the article needs improvement is not a criteria for deletion.
Tchaliburton (
talk) 06:52, 22 November 2014 (UTC)reply
But the fact that it doesn't properly demonstrate or source any notability in the first place is a criterion for deletion.
Bearcat (
talk) 22:46, 27 November 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Natg 19 (
talk) 01:09, 25 November 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete - An in-world bio with no indication of real-world significance or notability.
Tarc (
talk) 17:44, 25 November 2014 (UTC)reply
No RS coverage to demonstrate any real-world notability — all this contains is an in-universe biography of her, more suited for a Degrassi fansite than an encyclopedia. Delete and redirect per the other recent discussions.
Bearcat (
talk) 22:46, 27 November 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deadbeef 07:32, 3 December 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.