The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus.
✗plicit 11:57, 25 February 2024 (UTC)reply
This biographical article's sources probably don't indicate notability of the subject (not do they show significant coverage), likely fails
WP:GNG, and is written more like an essay; there are already draft versions including
Draft:Stefano De Marchi and
Draft:Prof. Stefano De Marchi. –
64andtim(
talk) 14:57, 3 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep. It would be a weak keep based on his citations, but I think
the existence of a special issue dedicated to him, with in-depth coverage of him, makes the case stronger. As for the existence of left-behind draft versions, I think that is an irrelevancy. —
David Eppstein (
talk) 17:33, 3 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep. Professor De Marchi runs a research group which does a variety of important work in numerical analysis. A number of his/their
papers are highly cited and influential (as one example, the
Padua points). –
jacobolus(t) 21:25, 3 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Rcsprinter123(visit) 17:12, 10 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
Red-tailed hawk(nest) 05:18, 18 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.