The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 14:30, 7 October 2021 (UTC) reply

Stefan Schaible

Stefan Schaible (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable. Seems to be trying to make a case for notabilty. Case rest of forbes interview and paid for bloomberg ref. The rest seem to be profiles. scope_creep ^Talk 06:36, 16 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone ^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:56, 16 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Spiderone ^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:56, 16 September 2021 (UTC) reply

• Weak keep. I'm not seeing a strong deletion rationale based on the many sources in the article which have not been sufficiently analyzed by the nominator. The article lists multiple foreign language offline refs. The nominator has not indicated that they have looked at the offline sources and evaluated whether or not they are significant. Accepting that the offline refs do indeed constitute significant coverage in good faith, this is a clear keep. 4meter4 ( talk) 04:42, 30 September 2021 (UTC) reply

This is an example of the sources [1]. It an simple annoucement, a press-release, an annoucment. Here is another example [2]. It is a passing mention. There is no doubt a senior guy in industry, but the references are very poor. Other references in the article include in the passing mention in the Stefan Schaible, deputy chief executive of consultancy Roland Berger, called for a modern-day Ostpolitik. Looking at Ref 12, another references on Roland Berger. Ref 13, [3] is on Berger again. Many of the reference in German I couldn't locate. I spend a lot of time translating German articles. I couldn't locate the ref in Handelsblatt, in ref 10. Most of the references, are very poor, often mentioned in relation to his boss, Roland Berger. There is no grouping of secondary sources on Schaible that confirms his notability. This is an example of the coverage I found, an interview: [4]. The management consultancy is called Roland Berger. Berger is still there. scope_creep ^Talk 06:58, 30 September 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.