- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 20:07, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Startup Manufactory
- Startup Manufactory ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:CORPDEPTH AFAICT. Created and maintained by an SPA inserting increasingly promotional content. Following earlier CSD-A7. "Puffery but salvageable", quoth the declining admin, but it's only getting worse. Kleuske ( talk) 18:40, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
- There is no need to delete the article as we had the discussion before. The firm is an integral part of the EU startup ecosystem. This discussion has been resolved before. A repeated threat of unnecessary deletion by a KNF despite earlier CFD-87. Suggested changes reverted back to meet Wiki standards. Discussion closed. (
talk) 18:50, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
- @ Jennymiller: Please provide a link to hat discussion, since I'm not aware of any. Kleuske ( talk) 16:48, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
- Also, please clarify "CFD-87" and "KNF". Thanks. Kleuske ( talk) 16:50, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Ivecos (t) 19:21, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Ivecos (t) 19:21, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Looks like a coi article of a nn company, lots of refs that don't support notability. The company had net assets last year of £147 according to company data. Article creator removed afd notice and appears unaware of WP guidelines. Szzuk ( talk) 21:41, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - ties record for the lowest ratio of (sources showing notability) to total sources cited. Not notable. Smallbones( smalltalk) 02:37, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.