The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Struggling to find any independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources - lack of
WP:SIGCOV. Fails
WP:BIO and
WP:NACADEMIC. Run-of-the-mill academic. Promotional article, created by a
WP:SPA.
Edwardx (
talk) 14:44, 10 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete nothing even close to showing the passing of any notability guideline for an academic.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 01:56, 16 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:16, 17 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:55, 24 January 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.