The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Sr13 02:41, 28 July 2007 (UTC)reply
non-notable church
Montchav 19:36, 20 July 2007 (UTC)reply
This AfD nomination was
incomplete. It is listed now.
DumbBOT 10:46, 23 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Keep 15th century perpendicular Gothic building replacing an even older church, so hardly non-notable. The article is extremely short, but that's not a reason to delete.
Emeraude 12:37, 23 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Keep Stubs are acceptable content. No exact reason given for nom. DGG (
talk) 23:17, 23 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Speedy keep It certainly is notable and I have added a little text to assert notability. I suggest that the nominator could have done some work to establish notability and to improve the article instead of putting it up for AfD. --
Malcolmxl5 08:09, 24 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Keep Highly notable on architectural grounds.
Golfcam 17:43, 24 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Keep I think it's a safe assumption that there a many references to this church in scholarly architecture books and local history books about Norwich and Norfolk.
Abberley2 02:05, 25 July 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.