The result was keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 23:35, 7 July 2010 (UTC) reply
Promotional article on an uncommon variety of trampoline and its creator, with effectively no independent sourcing to establish notability or most of the facts presented in the article. It's not clear to me that this is even worth mentioning in the Trampoline article, let alone having an article of its own. — Gavia immer ( talk) 21:20, 24 June 2010 (UTC) reply