- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Jenks24 ( talk) 10:44, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Spring King
- Spring King ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable unsigned band Karst ( talk) 10:42, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the
list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.
Singh (
talk) 15:27, 4 December 2015 (UTC) - Note: This debate has been included in the
list of England-related deletion discussions.
Singh (
talk) 15:28, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Seemingly local band with no better signs of general notability. SwisterTwister talk 06:36, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Small time. Szzuk ( talk) 18:11, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. There are two reasonably good sources in the article already, and a quick G-search turned up these: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Meets WP:BAND through non-trivial independent coverage in reliable sources. — sparklism hey! 12:18, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 ( talk) 01:24, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 ( talk) 01:24, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. I think there is sufficient non-trivial RS coverage to meet GNG, including sources mentioned by Sparklism and others. I've added additional sources to the article from Allmusic, The Telegraph, DIY Magazine, BrooklynVegan, and an NME EP review. -- Hobbes Goodyear ( talk) 16:33, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep per the sources identified above. Gongshow talk 20:59, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep per the sources identified by sparklism, which let the subject meet WP:BAND and GNG in my opinion. Vanamonde93 ( talk) 05:55, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.