- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. I'm snow closing this a day early, per my rationale below. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:46, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
Spider-Man comic book issue chronology
- Spider-Man comic book issue chronology ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is original research and fancruft, both of which are not allowed on Wikipedia. Spidey 104 21:05, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Fortdj33 ( talk) 22:19, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 01:08, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 14:20, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 14:20, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - fancruft Spiderone 16:22, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as WP:FANCRUFT. Ajf773 ( talk) 04:17, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
- Comment: I may snow close this for three reasons - the first is that it's fancruft, the second is that there is already an overview of Spider-Man's character history in the article - anything that isn't mentioned there is going to be considered too in-depth for a place like Wikipedia (as we give general overviews as opposed to in-detail descriptions), and finally the other issue is that this article would cover decades of material. This means that the list would be so lengthy that it would take long periods of time to load up, making it bulky and unwieldy. I don't see this closing any other way, as some of this chronology would be up to the reader's own interpretation and would just be too in-depth for what Wikipedia does. It's the type of thing you put on a fan wiki, not Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:43, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.