The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This article appears to have been created for publicity purposes. It does not meet the
WP:NCORP guidelines.
Gentleman wiki (
talk) 00:57, 28 September 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep Meets
WP:NCORP with the following sources (last 2 are more questionable, but they are from reliable outlets and didn't find evidence that they were sponsored/native ads):
Weak keep: The article may have been created for publicity purposes but that does not mean it has to remain that way (to some extent this seems like yet another example of a company that has gotten coverage in reliable sources, just not the kind PRs want to surface). The sources above aren't particularly great in terms of substantial details, but I added what I could. I had to go elsewhere for some of the more biographical points though.
Gnomingstuff (
talk) 14:36, 28 September 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.