From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Asmodea Oaktree ( talk) 15:13, 5 October 2021 (UTC) reply

Spence Diamonds

Spence Diamonds (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article appears to have been created for publicity purposes. It does not meet the WP:NCORP guidelines. Gentleman wiki ( talk) 00:57, 28 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Gentleman wiki ( talk) 00:57, 28 September 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 01:20, 28 September 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 01:20, 28 September 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Keep Meets WP:NCORP with the following sources (last 2 are more questionable, but they are from reliable outlets and didn't find evidence that they were sponsored/native ads):
  • Frei, Frances; Morriss, Anne (2012). Uncommon Service: How to Win by Putting Customers at the Core of Your Business. Harvard Business Press. p. 104-106. ISBN  978-1-4221-3331-6.
  • "Spence Diamonds rewrites guarantee following CBC investigation". CBC News. 2013-03-13.
  • Hoopfer, Evan (2019-08-16). "Company with U.S. headquarters in Dallas aims to disrupt diamond industry". Dallas Business Journal. Retrieved 2021-09-28.
  • "Retail therapy: Lab-grown diamonds debut in Dallas, and tax-free shopping in Texas this weekend". Dallas Morning News. 2019-05-24. Retrieved 2021-09-28.
Jumpytoo Talk 02:29, 28 September 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Weak keep: The article may have been created for publicity purposes but that does not mean it has to remain that way (to some extent this seems like yet another example of a company that has gotten coverage in reliable sources, just not the kind PRs want to surface). The sources above aren't particularly great in terms of substantial details, but I added what I could. I had to go elsewhere for some of the more biographical points though. Gnomingstuff ( talk) 14:36, 28 September 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.