The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ♠
PMC♠
(talk) 10:26, 27 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Per
WP:TNT. I don't doubt that probably a decent article could be written about SAIACS, but the article in its current state ain't it. The current article borders on qualifying for
WP:G11, since it is written in a promotional tone and would need to be rewritten to be encyclopaedic. I have tried to look for a clean version in its history, but couldn't find anything salvageable. Salvio 09:57, 20 September 2022 (UTC)reply
SAIACS is a prominent seminary in India. No need to delete this page. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
223.186.67.132 (
talk) 00:57, 21 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep. Appears to meet
WP:GNG. AfD is for deletion not cleanup and even the proposer appears to think the topic is notable. --
Necrothesp (
talk) 10:18, 21 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep, trimming the promo material wouldn't be very difficult.
Jahaza (
talk) 04:21, 22 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep Don't see issue with notability.
Lorstaking (
talk) 15:08, 22 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep as the nominator does not doubt the notability of the topic but is nominating on the basis of the tone of the article being advertorial but that can be addressed by a rewrite rather than deletion, imv
Atlantic306 (
talk) 20:41, 24 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep meets GNG subject is notable.
Saturnrises (
talk) 07:16, 27 September 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.