The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
There is only one solar plant of note in Azerbaijan per RS
[1]. An entire article devoted to "solar power in Azerbaijan" gives outsized importance to the subject and may mislead readers that this petrostate is a major producer of renewable energy. If there is any content worth keeping, it can be merged with
Renewable energy in Azerbaijan.
Thenightaway (
talk) 00:57, 1 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete: non-notable subject, author likely a COI SPA, part of a massive flooding of recent Azerbaijan related articles, most now in AfD.
Owen×☎ 00:06, 4 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete: Actually, there are several solar power plants in Azerbaijan right now, for example
in Pirallahi. The names of the solar plants are true and can be tranfered to "Renewable energy in Azerbaijan" article. But the subject itself fails WP:GNG and almost the entire article is about "solar radiation in Azerbaijan". --
Surə🗯 18:24, 4 January 2024 (UTC)reply
I have excerpted to that article
Chidgk1 (
talk) 20:00, 5 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep I understand your point but if we delete it now we will only have to recreate it again in a couple of years time. I have no conflict of interest and am willing to improve the article.
Chidgk1 (
talk) 19:09, 5 January 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Thenightaway If you nominate articles for deletion often please consider using
Wikipedia:Twinkle as that should automatically notify the creator of the article
Chidgk1 (
talk) 19:59, 5 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 03:09, 8 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment I both agree that it's doomed to be a stub for a while until Azerbaijan does more with solar, but it's also likely that they will eventually. Although I would guess ten years and not two years. Keeping or deleting depends on if preemptive creates like these are setting a good example or a bad example.
Delete. If we have to recreate the article in the future, so be it; it isn't encyclopedically relevant now, and as Sura points out, it's better handled on
Renewable energy in Azerbaijan. --
asilvering (
talk) 07:22, 15 January 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.