The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
It exists and has some coverage - it is borderline hence sitting in
CAT:NN for 11 years. It is hard to separate the promotion from the information. It doesn't seem notable by any criteria except GNG, and I don't think it has the level of coverage for GNG.
Boleyn (
talk) 08:37, 2 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep I think this is still a legitimate and helpful page, especially with the dramatic increase in Smart Forms this year with covid. I think it it satisfies GNG.
Cabrils (
talk) 05:38, 7 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:16, 9 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Kj cheetham (
talk) 18:41, 16 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde (
Talk) 05:20, 25 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete: No, this does not satisfy the GNG. None of the non-primary (and I do emphasize that) sources are more than casual mentions or namedrops.
Being "legitimate" or "helpful" meet no policy or guideline criterion to keep, and whether more people are using this thing or not -- entirely speculative -- does not by that reason alone generate significant coverage in reliable sources of the subject. Ravenswing 07:53, 25 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. Not enough significant and independent coverage to establish notability. ɴᴋᴏɴ21❯❯❯talk 00:01, 26 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete: No reliable significant coverage.
SL93 (
talk) 03:09, 27 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete Does not have enough independent coverage to be notable.
Nika2020 (
talk) 21:27, 28 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete With all of the dead links and confused wording, it's confusing whether this article is trying to establish promoting a non-notable generic neologism or a non-notable commercial product, but either way it fails wp:notability as such. North8000 (
talk) 12:20, 30 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.