From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist ( talk) 00:59, 21 January 2019 (UTC) reply

Skipp A. H. Williamson

Skipp A. H. Williamson (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A better search is:(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No real claim to fame here. Sources are either listings or casual mentions. Being a businesswoman isn't enough to pass the bar of WP:GNG. Dennis Brown - 13:55, 13 January 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka ( talk) 18:42, 13 January 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka ( talk) 18:42, 13 January 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka ( talk) 18:42, 13 January 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Keep:This person was named 3rd most influential management consultant in Australia by the Australian Financial Review, the country's leading business news paper. She is one of the leading business people in the country and owns a global consulting firm. Compared to others on Wikipedia, she ought to measure up quite well. I would say.
Against deletion. New but motivated ( talk) 07:01, 14 January 2019 (UTC) reply
For info: on going to create the redirect from the natural title of Skipp Williamson I found there that an article at that title had been created in Dec 2015, speedied A7, moved to userspace as User:Donaldeval/Skipp Williamsonat user's request, deleted at user's request, user then blocked; page was re-created in March 2016 and March 2017 and deleted each time as "(G5: Created by a banned or blocked user (Mamadoutadioukone) in violation of ban or block (TW))". I know nothing about that blocked user, and can't see whether this article is a re-creation of that ... but the "success story" ref is October 2017, so this is clearly NOT an exact copy, at least, of the deleted version. Pam D 10:15, 14 January 2019 (UTC) reply
    • I agree w the renaming suggestion.

New but motivated ( talk) 19:57, 14 January 2019 (UTC) reply

  • Keep: Clearly notable in Australian context. one of the bigger employers in the industry Rmarsden ( talk) 10:41, 14 January 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Weak keep I think there is just enough IRS to satisfy WP:NEXIST to get over the GNG line. Aoziwe ( talk) 11:21, 14 January 2019 (UTC) reply
Could you fit in any more acronyms? ;) Rmarsden ( talk) 11:58, 15 January 2019 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.