- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) LibStar ( talk) 00:19, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
Siobhan Austen
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Siobhan Austen ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Only 2 articles link to this article. Could not find coverage to meet WP:PROF or WP:BIO. LibStar ( talk) 02:22, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:40, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:40, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:40, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. See the well-cited articles at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Siobhan+Austen%22 Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 04:05, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Phil Bridger ( talk) 12:07, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:HEY, Phil Bridger. Seemed to already well meet WP:PROF to me, but for the absence of doubt I've added 4 reliable sources. Cabrils ( talk) 12:39, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, easily meets WP:PROF as per discussion above. LibStar continues to nominate articles for AfD without performing basic WP:Before, or demonstrating a competence in evaluating source for SIGCOV. Raises questions of competence Jack4576 ( talk) 07:35, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep (barely): There are two reviews of their book [1]. Source eval:
Comments Source Publisher, primary 1. Austen, Siobhan (2003). Culture and the Labour Market. Edward Elgar Publishing. p. [1]. ISBN 9781843763178. Primary, from employer 2. ^ Jump up to:a b c d "Curriculum Vitae Siobhan Austen". Curtin University. Primary, from employer 3. ^ "Overview of the Wiser group". Curtin University. Iffy 4. ^ Wood, Stephanie (18 June 2022). "'I don't mind camping, but I won't sleep in the car': what happens when superannuation keeps failing women". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 19 May 2023. Iffy 5. ^ Costa, Monica; Sharp, Rhonda; Austen, Siobhan (29 September 2020). "Each budget used to have a gender impact statement. We need it back". The Conversation. Retrieved 19 May 2023. Iffy 6. ^ Wade, Matt (16 July 2019). "There's a reason Australia's gender pay gap is so persistent". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 19 May 2023. Primary, from employer 7. ^ "Overview of Siobhan Austen". Curtin University.
- Its a close call between TOOSOON and Keep, I think the squeeks past GNG and NPROF "7. The person has made substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity." states that "if the person is frequently quoted in conventional media as an academic expert in a particular area." gives a little room past the two reviews of their work. // Timothy :: talk 04:41, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.