The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit 10:27, 19 October 2021 (UTC) reply

Simon Dawlat

Simon Dawlat (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

the article is not about him, but his two companies, neither of which are notable. this is pure promotionalism , translated from the equally promotionalism article in the frWP. DGG ( talk ) 19:32, 6 October 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone ^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:35, 6 October 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Spiderone ^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:35, 6 October 2021 (UTC) reply

• Delete. DGG, I'm surprised you didn't nominate this back in 2014 when you first came across it. There seems to be reasonable coverage of the companies (Forbes and Business Insider), so they could be repurposed into an article about one of them, but the founder does not seem to be notable. The biographical information is unsourced. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 19:39, 6 October 2021 (UTC) reply

in 2014 I redirected it to one of the companies, but it was restored and I'm unfortunately unable to watch everything I edit. DGG ( talk ) 04:39, 7 October 2021 (UTC) -- reply

• Delete per DGG fails WP:GNG. Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 06:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.